ELAN logo review
3.4 / 5
Logo score

Logo review ofElan

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Modern, Illustrative Sustainability
3/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
2/5
Scale
Review next
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon Text is generally distinguishable.
Checkmark icon Consistent line weight helps cohesion.

Warning icon The 'A' shape is unconventional and could confuse some viewers.
Warning icon Leaf on the 'N' slightly distracts from letterform clarity.

4/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Creative integration of solar panel and leaf elements into the wordmark.
Checkmark icon Greenhouse shape in 'A' provides a custom touch.

Warning icon Fusion of stereotypical eco-symbols (leaves, solar panel) feels somewhat expected for the industry.
Warning icon Could benefit from a more unexpected or abstract approach.

4/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Limited color palette communicates eco message and energy.
Checkmark icon Good contrast between yellow, blue, and green.

Warning icon More than two accent colors may complicate reproduction in some brand contexts.

Green
#43B02A

Yellow
#FFDD44

Blue
#195DAB

Your palette is close. Explore sharper color combinations with Colorfly.design before updating the logo.

Explore palettes
3/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Horizontal balance is present, giving a stable look.
Checkmark icon Vertical elements (leaf, solar panel) create visual hierarchy.

Warning icon Solar panel and frame float above text, making the overall weight top heavy.
Warning icon Letterforms feel uneven due to different shapes and design incorporation.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
2/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon Simple lines theoretically allow for shrinking if vectorized.
Checkmark icon Logo works well on white backgrounds, e.g. on letterhead.

Warning icon Fine gridlines on solar panel will be lost at small sizes like favicons or embroidery.
Warning icon Thin lines might fail in black-and-white printing or on complex backgrounds.
Warning icon Multiple details hinder application on small merchandise or digital app icons.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No obvious inappropriate dual meanings or suggestive imagery.

3 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Symbolism is tightly integrated into the wordmark.
Checkmark icon Cohesion between eco-theme and typography style.

Warning icon Solar panel/additional framing feels slightly detached, not as fluidly embedded as other elements.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo