ELAN logo review
3.4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Elan

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Modern, Illustrative Sustainability
3/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
2/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Legibility

  • Text is generally distinguishable.
  • Consistent line weight helps cohesion.
  • The 'A' shape is unconventional and could confuse some viewers.
  • Leaf on the 'N' slightly distracts from letterform clarity.
4/5

Originality

  • Creative integration of solar panel and leaf elements into the wordmark.
  • Greenhouse shape in 'A' provides a custom touch.
  • Fusion of stereotypical eco-symbols (leaves, solar panel) feels somewhat expected for the industry.
  • Could benefit from a more unexpected or abstract approach.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Limited color palette communicates eco message and energy.
  • Good contrast between yellow, blue, and green.
  • More than two accent colors may complicate reproduction in some brand contexts.
Green#43B02A
Yellow#FFDD44
Blue#195DAB

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
3/5

Balance alignment

  • Horizontal balance is present, giving a stable look.
  • Vertical elements (leaf, solar panel) create visual hierarchy.
  • Solar panel and frame float above text, making the overall weight top heavy.
  • Letterforms feel uneven due to different shapes and design incorporation.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2/5

Scalability

  • Simple lines theoretically allow for shrinking if vectorized.
  • Logo works well on white backgrounds, e.g. on letterhead.
  • Fine gridlines on solar panel will be lost at small sizes like favicons or embroidery.
  • Thin lines might fail in black-and-white printing or on complex backgrounds.
  • Multiple details hinder application on small merchandise or digital app icons.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious inappropriate dual meanings or suggestive imagery.
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Symbolism is tightly integrated into the wordmark.
  • Cohesion between eco-theme and typography style.
  • Solar panel/additional framing feels slightly detached, not as fluidly embedded as other elements.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo