View review
Lunch From Home
Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.
Logo performance breakdown
Legibility
'LUNCH' is bold and highly legible.
'From Home' is decorative but still readable at medium sizes.
'From Home' may lose clarity at small sizes due to script font and thin strokes.
Originality
Mixes script and bold sans-serif to create some distinction.
Container outline is somewhat recognizable and ties into the message.
Food container is extremely generic for the industry.
Typography pairing, while decent, is not unique or memorable.
Color harmony
Colors are limited and harmonious.
Bright orange is well balanced by soft green and brown.
Script color may get lost on darker backgrounds.
Vivid orange can feel aggressive if overused in smaller placements.
Vivid Orange
#FF6F2C
Green
#42B049
Dark Brown
#66302F
White
#FFFFFF
Your palette is close. Refine the color roles and combinations before updating the logo.
Build brand colorsBalance alignment
Good hierarchy between 'LUNCH' and 'From Home'.
Container icon aligned with text baseline.
Container outline feels loosely attached to text, creating a visual disconnect.
'From Home' centering under two left-heavy elements looks misaligned.
Scalability
Simple forms and bold type are generally scalable.
Works on banners, social media, and packaging.
Fine script in 'From Home' is problematic for favicon or monochrome embroidery.
Food container outline may be too thin for small format applications.
200x250 px
100×125 px
50×62 px
Misinterpretations
No inappropriate or confusing symbolism detected.
Symbol & text fit
Uses icon directly tied to 'LUNCH'.
Wordmark and logomark are easy to separate for alternate uses.
Icon feels like a literal afterthought next to 'LUNCH' with little style integration.
No shared design characteristics between icon and typography.
Wondering how your logo performs?
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.