AMPE logo review
3.9 / 5
Logo score

Logo review ofAmpe

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Pictorial, Modern Sports
5/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Review next
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

5/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon Text 'AMPE' is clear, bold, and highly legible, with no decoration that impairs readability.
Checkmark icon High color contrast between the text and background enhances legibility.

3/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Combining the star with dynamic human silhouettes to suggest sporting action is a clear, purposeful approach.
Checkmark icon Color palette demonstrates geographical/cultural context.

Warning icon Star symbols are very generic in sports branding.
Warning icon Figurative silhouettes are common and do not introduce a unique visual twist.

4/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon The three main colors connect well with familiar regional/cultural palettes, and none clash.
Checkmark icon Contrast ensures elements are distinct from one another.

Warning icon Multiple saturated colors reduce flexibility for single-color or low-contrast contexts, and the execution feels a bit heavy.

Red
#E01C1B

Yellow
#F6E049

Green
#227634

White
#FFFFFF

Black
#000000

Your palette is close. Explore sharper color combinations with Colorfly.design before updating the logo.

Explore palettes
4/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Central positioning of the star and figures creates a generally balanced focal point.
Checkmark icon Weight distribution of the logomark above the bold logotype has a visual anchor.

Warning icon Human figures slightly disrupt symmetry and spatial balance inside the star, leading to slight visual tension.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
3/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon Star shape and bold text will remain identifiable at medium to large sizes, such as banners or sports jerseys.
Checkmark icon Solid forms make it suitable for posters and print applications.

Warning icon Small details in the human figures may become indistinguishable at favicon or embroidery scale.
Warning icon Multicolor gradient may not reproduce well in monochromatic or single-color applications.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or confusing symbolism detected.
Checkmark icon Star and athletes’ imagery is straightforward for the context.

4 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Bold type matches the solid, anchored feeling of the star graphic above.
Checkmark icon Overall cohesion between the sense of movement in the icon and the strong presence of the type.

Warning icon Logo mark is much more dynamic, while the type is static — a subtle mismatch in expressive energy.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo