Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of Green Arc ENERGY
Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Detected text:
Business industry:
Review requested by Dishaagarwalll
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Legibility
Distinct color separation between 'Green Arc' and 'ENERGY' aids in readability
Font is generally readable at medium sizes
Stylized font for 'Green Arc' creates slight readability issues, especially with the letter 'G' resembling a 'B' or '6'
The 'E' in 'ENERGY' is broken into horizontal segments, reducing legibility at smaller sizes
Inconsistent font weights between words cause readability distraction
Scalability versatility
Symbol is recognizable at moderate sizes
High contrast may help it stand out in printed material
Gradient in the sphere and leaf shading won’t reproduce well in single-color or embroidered applications
High level of detail in gradients loses clarity at small scales, such as on business cards or favicons
Thin lines in 'ENERGY' word may disappear in small formats
200x250 px
100×125 px
50×62 px
Balance alignment
Logo is horizontally aligned
Central placement of the symbol above the words maintains general balance
Tension caused by contrasting styles between rounded 'Green Arc' and geometric 'ENERGY' disturbs visual balance
Size relation between symbol and text feels slightly off; symbol dominates
Originality
Combination of leaves and sun is industry-relevant and moderately customized
Typographic choices show effort to be modern and distinctive
Leaf and sun motif is overused in green/energy brands, reducing uniqueness
Gradients are common in eco logos, failing to create a strong, original identity
Logomark wordmark fit
Both symbol and wordmark use green hues, seeking color harmony
Mismatch in styles—organic curves in the symbol and 'Green Arc' vs. geometric 'ENERGY'—they don’t harmonize
Visual weight of the symbol is overpowering relative to the thinner wordmark fonts
Aesthetic look
Color palette is clean and pleasant
Shiny gradients give a contemporary look
Logo feels visually busy due to gradients and complex letter styling
Lack of coherent visual style between symbol and text reduces overall aesthetic appeal
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
No inappropriate or confusing shapes detected
Imagery is safe and clearly relates to clean energy/nature
Color harmony
Consistent use of green and yellow fits the eco/energy industry
Two main hues create unity
Gradient use may clash in certain print scenarios and complicate usage on different backgrounds
Yellow
#FFD700
Green
#61B329
Green
#1FAB54
White
#FFFFFF