Consider increasing contrast on 'able' for universal legibility
Light gray could wash out versus white backgrounds.
Improves readability for visually impaired viewers and at smaller sizes.
Logo score
Combination mark category
Readable
creative706471
Essential logo review
Strong, professional, and conceptually relevant; minor visual tweaks could further elevate the logo.
Legibility
Originality
Balance
Scale
Your next steps
What to fix first
Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.
Detailed review
Logo performance breakdown
—Not scored
Brief & logo match
Book icon and word 'Readable' strongly indicate connection to reading or publishing.
Legibility
- Clear, highly readable wordmark
- Good spacing and straightforward font choice
- Slight color fade on 'able' slightly reduces contrast
Originality
- Playful use of book and eye motif
- Distinct from more generic book icons
- Book-with-eyes motif has some precedent in educational branding
Color harmony
- Monochrome with gray fade fits a modern look
- Gradient feels slightly generic, doesn't add much distinctive brand character
Black#000000
Light Gray#B0B0B0
Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.
Create a full color palette using these colors
Create new paletteBalance alignment
- Strong left-to-right flow
- Book icon and wordmark align neatly
Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.
Scalability
- Simple shapes support good scalability
- Minimal details aid reproduction at small size
- Eye details may lose clarity at very tiny sizes
Misinterpretations
- No negative or confusing alternate readings
Symbol & text fit
- Book icon conceptually and visually complements the 'Readable' name
Try your own review
Review my logo
Wondering how your logo performs?
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.
Keep exploring
