Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of TechHack
Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Detected text:
Business industry:
Review requested by Rok
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Legibility
Clean, geometric sans-serif typeface aids readability.
High contrast between the wordmark and the white background.
The capitalized 'T' and 'H' could create minor visual rhythm issues in continuous reading.
The type alignment could feel slightly off because the logomark dominates the visual hierarchy.
Scalability versatility
Bold, simple shapes ensure the logo is visible at large sizes such as banners or billboards.
Colorful elements attract attention and would stand out on digital platforms.
Multiple colors and gradient-like segmentation may cause issues on small-scale applications (favicons or embroidery), where detail may be lost.
Fine white gaps between colored shapes may not render cleanly in small or low-res formats.
200x250 px
100×125 px
50×62 px
Balance alignment
Curvilinear forms are well-aligned and create a sense of motion.
Overall vertical symmetry gives the logo a strong, upright foundation.
The logomark is visually heavier than the wordmark, slightly dominating the layout and creating a mild imbalance for horizontal or compact applications.
Originality
Dynamic, abstract mark is less conventional than typical tech icons.
Color scheme is vibrant and less common in the tech sector.
The swoosh and dot composition, while energetic, is still somewhat generic and could resemble marks used in other unrelated industries (sports, wellness, etc.).
No clever use of negative space or letter integration—missed opportunity for uniqueness.
Logomark wordmark fit
Typeface complements the rounded forms of the logomark.
Color of the wordmark contrasts well with the colorful symbol.
The abstract symbol’s size and vibrancy overpowers the more understated wordmark, which can create hierarchy issues.
The mark feels almost disconnected from the wordmark, lacking integration.
Aesthetic look
Fresh, clean, and visually appealing; feels energetic and modern.
Color choice is bold without being overwhelming.
Busy due to three main colored shapes and a separate dot, leading to a slightly crowded feel.
Gradient-like multi-color approach edges close to over-decoration for certain tech applications.
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
No inappropriate or suggestive shapes present.
Abstract nature avoids accidental negative associations.
Color harmony
Colors are harmonious, playful, and evoke a sense of creativity and innovation.
Three bold colors plus black/navy could be seen as slightly excessive.
Potential print and reproduction issues with this palette, especially if used in monotone or B&W scenarios.
yellow
#FFD600
cyan
#00B5EA
pink
#EB439F
dark navy
#0A0A21