tv variex logo review
2.5/5
Logo score Combination mark category

tv variex

creative793616 Essential logo review

Functional layout and readability, but needs significant revisions in symbol originality and practical execution for professional use.

Combination Mark Modern, Glossy, Abstract Media/entertainment
4/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
3/5
Balance
2.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Redesign the symbol to avoid resemblance to the Xbox logo and establish a unique brand identity.

High priority High effort

Current symbol is too visually similar to an existing, well-known trademark.

distinguishes the brand and avoids legal ambiguity

2

Develop a simplified or flat responsive version for smaller use cases.

Medium priority Medium effort

Current 3D/gradient mark will be difficult to reproduce at reduced sizes or in print.

enhances scalability and usability

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

Appropriate for media/entertainment; dynamic mark and modern style fit.

4/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark is sharp and readable
  • Lowercase 'q' may confuse some, though overall reading is clear
2/5

Originality

  • Bold color usage on mark
  • Abstract 'X' on a sphere closely resembles the Xbox logo; lacks distinctiveness
3/5

Color harmony

  • Vibrant gradient attracts attention
  • Harsh rainbow gradient clashes with muted gray text; lacks sophisticated palette unity
Gray#B8B8B8
Red#FF0000
Orange#FF7F00
Yellow#FFFF00
Green#00FF00
Blue#0000FF
Violet#8B00FF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
3/5

Balance alignment

  • Vertical alignment is maintained; wordmark is visually centered
  • Spherical mark dominates visual space and competes with wordmark, disrupting harmony
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2.5/5

Scalability

  • Simple wordmark; bold shapes
  • Glossy 3D effect and gradient details may not reproduce well at small sizes or in single-color situations
4/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious negative shapes or interpretations
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Modern geometry; both feature rounded shapes
  • No clear conceptual or stylistic link between mark and wordmark beyond color palette
Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo