Kendala logo review
4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Kendala

A strong, professional logo with contemporary appeal. Minor refinements can enhance cohesion and versatility.

Combination Mark Modern Geometric Minimalism
4/5
Legibility
3.5/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Action plan

What to fix first

The most important fixes to handle before polishing the full presentation.

1

Increase tagline legibility or omit it in small-scale versions.

High priority

The tagline is currently unreadable, which could undermine perception.

Impact: Improves Brand Appearance And Professionalism In All Formats. · Effort: Low

2

Consider tightening the space between the symbol and wordmark.

Medium priority

A more compact lockup may feel more contemporary and balanced.

Impact: Refines Visual Cohesion And Makes The Lockup More Unified. · Effort: Low

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon 'Kendala' is clear and readable at medium size.
Checkmark icon Font selection is modern and fitting.

Warning icon Smaller tagline is unreadable, could affect micro-usage.

3.5/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Geometric mark is visually impactful.

Warning icon Motif is somewhat generic and could be seen in many industries.

4/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Red contrasts well with black for strong visibility.

Warning icon Very simple palette—secondary accent color could deepen brand feel.

Red
#D60000

Black
#000000

Your palette is close. Refine the color roles and combinations before updating the logo.

Build brand colors
4/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Mark and wordmark are well aligned horizontally.
Checkmark icon Good optical weight and spacing between elements.

Warning icon Slight gap between mark and text may feel a bit wide.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
4/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon Bold shapes are scalable and recognizable at small sizes.
Checkmark icon Minimal detail ensures adaptability.

Warning icon Fine tagline details are lost at smaller sizes.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No negative or confusing interpretations detected.

4/5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Mark and wordmark complement each other in style and weight.

Warning icon No visible narrative link between the mark and the brand name.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo