Refine the wordmark for slightly improved instant readability, especially the double 'D' area.
Current font is stylish but could confuse at a glance, reducing practical legibility.
medium
Logo score
Combination mark category
LIDDEEN
Shihab24
Essential logo review
Originality is somewhat generic but safe for the industry; strong usability and no critical risks present.
Legibility
Originality
Balance
Scale
Your next steps
What to fix first
Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.
Test leaf detail at small sizes; consider simplifying outlines if detail is lost.
Ensures versatility across all usage scales.
low
Detailed review
Logo performance breakdown
—Not scored
Brief & logo match
Leaf symbol and green palette directly reinforce organic/natural positioning; minimalist style gives a premium, clean impression.
Legibility
- Text is bold, clear, and geometric
- Stylized font may reduce instant readability, especially with the double 'D'
Originality
- Leaf usage is appropriate for organic/natural brands
- Leaf-in-rectangle motif is somewhat generic
Color harmony
- Green gradient is fresh and suits organic market
Apple#6AC043
White#FFFFFF
Pigment green#399C3A
Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.
Create a full color palette using these colors
Create new paletteBalance alignment
- Good vertical and horizontal balance between symbol and text
- Symmetrical composition
Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.
Scalability
- Simple shapes and solid colors aid scalability
- Thin lines in the leaf may lose detail at small sizes
Misinterpretations
- No inappropriate or unintended visual readings detected
Symbol & text fit
- Wordmark is well integrated under the mark
Try your own review
Review my logo
Wondering how your logo performs?
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.
Keep exploring
