LIDDEEN logo review
4.4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Liddeen

Originality is somewhat generic but safe for the industry; strong usability and no critical risks present.

Combination Mark Minimalist Geometric Organic Food
4/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
5/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Refine the wordmark for slightly improved instant readability, especially the double 'D' area.

Medium priority Medium effort

Current font is stylish but could confuse at a glance, reducing practical legibility.

medium

2

Test leaf detail at small sizes; consider simplifying outlines if detail is lost.

Low priority Low effort

Ensures versatility across all usage scales.

low

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Organic Food / Premium Branding

    Leaf symbol and green palette directly reinforce organic/natural positioning; minimalist style gives a premium, clean impression.

4/5

Legibility

  • Text is bold, clear, and geometric
  • Stylized font may reduce instant readability, especially with the double 'D'
3/5

Originality

  • Leaf usage is appropriate for organic/natural brands
  • Leaf-in-rectangle motif is somewhat generic
5/5

Color harmony

  • Green gradient is fresh and suits organic market
Apple#6AC043
White#FFFFFF
Pigment green#399C3A

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
5/5

Balance alignment

  • Good vertical and horizontal balance between symbol and text
  • Symmetrical composition
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Simple shapes and solid colors aid scalability
  • Thin lines in the leaf may lose detail at small sizes
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or unintended visual readings detected
5/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Wordmark is well integrated under the mark

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo