КИНГИСЕППСКАЯ ГИМНАЗИЯ logo review
4.6/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Кингисеппская Гимназия

Solid, distinctive design with minor technical improvements suggested before final implementation.

Combination Mark Modern Geometric Education
5/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Refine left-bottom quadrant lines for clarity at small sizes.

Medium priority Low effort

Current detail may not reproduce well very small.

Improves scalability and maintain visual clarity across applications.

2

Adjust optical weight balance between symbol and text for slightly improved equilibrium.

Low priority Low effort

Minor tweaks to mark sizing or spacing may resolve slight left-heaviness.

Enhances overall logo harmony on all placements.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Detected Industry

    Modern, professional look is appropriate for the education sector, communicates stability and trust.

5/5

Legibility

  • Text is clear and easy to read
  • Typeface is bold and highly legible
4/5

Originality

  • Abstract symbol avoids clichés, has a custom feel
  • Geometric shield and block motifs are somewhat common in the education sector
5/5

Color harmony

  • Shades of blue are harmonious and suitable for education
  • Strong contrast aids clarity
Denim#3179C9
Mountain Meadow#6BB7F4
Biscay#285293

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Good spacing and proportional relationship between symbol and text
  • Elements are visually aligned horizontally
  • Logo mark feels slightly heavier on the left, which can throw off optical balance
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Geometric symbol remains clear at small sizes
  • Simple shapes support versatility
  • Small internal details in left-bottom quadrant may blur at very small scales
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or unintended visual resemblances detected
5/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Strong harmony between geometric style of mark and bold typeface

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo