NARMATHA HOSPITAL logo review
4.1/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Narmatha Hospital

Visually appropriate for healthcare, especially maternity; minor tweaks will strengthen versatility and balance for client use.

Combination Mark Modern Healthcare Minimalist Healthcare
5/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Refine the symbol/wordmark proportion—consider slightly reducing the symbol size or increasing the wordmark weight for improved balance.

Medium priority Low effort

Current presentation has the symbol slightly dominating the text.

Makes the logo feel more cohesive and professional

2

Simplify tiny details of the baby or try a thicker outline so it holds up better in small sizes or single-color versions.

Medium priority Medium effort

Some baby details may blur at small scales.

Enhances scalability for various applications

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Healthcare/maternity Focus

    The baby form and nurturing shapes are appropriate and communicate the field well.

5/5

Legibility

  • Text is clear and highly readable
  • Good contrast between text and background
3/5

Originality

  • Use of a baby in a yin-yang form is somewhat unique
  • Baby-in-womb imagery is common in hospital and maternity branding
4/5

Color harmony

  • Vibrant, health-appropriate palette
  • Teal and magenta contrast may feel a bit bold for some healthcare audiences
Teal#00B1B1
Magenta#E61C7B
White#FFFFFF
LightGold#F8D46A
Black#000000

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Centrally aligned; balanced composition
  • Slight size imbalance between the symbol and the wordmark
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Simple shapes should scale well
  • Distinctive mark even at smaller sizes
  • Small details in the baby figure might lose clarity at tiny sizes
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or embarrassing misreads found in the shapes
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and wordmark feel connected by theme and color
  • Color saturation of the symbol is stronger than the more muted black subtext

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo