ouioweb logo review
3.3/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Ouioweb

A readable, functional wordmark with competent construction, but the visual concept is generic and risks blending in.

Wordmark Rounded Sans-serif Wordmark With A Simple, Geometric Accent Mark. Technology / Digital Services
5/5
Legibility
2.5/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
3.5/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Standalone mark

Explore a more unique mark or integrate a distinctive twist into the current arc.

Visible issue High priority Medium effort
Area to inspectApproximate location

The arc and 'O' combination as a symbol is visually basic and commonly seen in web/tech brands, reducing distinctiveness.

How to check

Compare to typical internet or communication logo motifs.

See the category review
2

wordmark

Visually harmonize the arc and text, either by adjusting the arc or the letter O's form.

Optional refinement Medium priority Low effort
Area to inspectApproximate location

The arc's visual weight feels slightly disconnected from the geometric type, leading to a mild imbalance at the start of the wordmark.

How to check

Evaluate overall flow and weight from left to right.

See the category review
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Brief & logo match

Based on an inferred industry
Compared with

Assuming a digital/web brand, with no explicit user brief, based on 'ouioweb' and arc signals.

It expresses digital/web concepts but lacks uniqueness to set it apart in a crowded field.

  • Industry Relevance

    The wordmark and arc evoke web/tech and connectivity, which is suitable for a digital service.

  • Memorability

    Basic arc motif is functional but may not be memorable among similar web-related brands.

5/5

Legibility

  • Excellent text clarity.
  • Even spacing and balanced letterforms.
2.5/5

Originality

  • Clean motif, but familiar to web/tech.

  • The arc and 'O' combination as a symbol is visually basic and commonly seen in web/tech brands, reducing distinctiveness.

    Visible issue Standalone mark

    Try: Explore a more unique mark or integrate a distinctive twist into the current arc.

    Check: Compare to typical internet or communication logo motifs.

    Area to inspectApproximate location
3.5/5

Balance alignment

  • Mostly balanced wordmark.

  • The arc's visual weight feels slightly disconnected from the geometric type, leading to a mild imbalance at the start of the wordmark.

    Optional refinement wordmark

    Try: Visually harmonize the arc and text, either by adjusting the arc or the letter O's form.

    Check: Evaluate overall flow and weight from left to right.

    Area to inspectApproximate location
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Simple forms scale well.
  • Monochrome enhances versatility.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No negative connotations or unintended shapes.
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Arc and O are visually linked.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo
Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews