PERISAI JAYA Tangguh Mental, Jaya Bersama logo review
3.7/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Perisai Jaya Tangguh Mental, Jaya Bersama

Solid, context-appropriate logo but should pursue stronger originality for long-term brand value.

Combination Mark Modern Emblem Education
5/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Develop a simplified version for small-scale uses to maintain tagline legibility.

Medium priority Medium effort

Tagline may be illegible at small sizes.

Improves versatility and clarity in various applications.

2

Explore custom or less generic iconography for the handshake or torch to boost distinctiveness.

Medium priority Medium effort

Motif is contextually correct but widely used.

Enhances brand memorability and reduces generic appearance.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Detected Industry

    Visual language is a good fit for an educational or team-building context, signaling unity, aspiration, and protection.

5/5

Legibility

  • All text is highly readable and clear.
3/5

Originality

  • Combination of handshake, torch, and shield is contextually relevant.
  • Motif is common for educational and community organizations; not unique.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Color palette is well-coordinated and communicates trust and energy.
  • Three main colors create some complexity; may need a one/two-color version for simplicity.
Catalina Blue#113651
Mantis#50B763
Gold#FFC838
White#F7F7F7

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Shield, icons, and text are well-centered and visually stable.
  • Slight imbalance in color weighting between hands gives a minor visual tilt.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Bold shapes and solid lines aid visibility at small sizes.
  • Secondary tagline may lose clarity if scaled very small.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or confusing dual meanings detected.
5/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and wordmark pair cohesively by color and style.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo