Ras Computers, The Computer Training Institute…,.. logo review
2.8 / 5
Logo score
Logo review of

Ras Computers, The Computer Training Institute…,..

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Corporate, Slightly Retro Education
3/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
4/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
2/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon The main business name 'Ras Computers' is prominent in a large, contrasting script font.
Checkmark icon Supporting text is not overly decorative.

Warning icon The orange-red script font can be difficult to read at a distance or in small formats.
Warning icon Supporting text under the business name becomes very crowded and loses hierarchy, especially the tagline and details.
Warning icon Light blue tagline has low contrast on white background, hurting readability.

2/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Abstract 'R' integration attempts to provide a unique touch relevant to the business name.
Checkmark icon Power symbol incorporated in the blue circle is industry-appropriate.

Warning icon Elements like the 'R' swoosh and power button are standard motifs commonly used in tech/education logos.
Warning icon Overall composition feels generic and lacks innovative visual storytelling or memorable uniqueness.

3/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Limited to two main accent colors (orange, blue) with neutral white, offering some consistency.

Warning icon Color palette feels a bit harsh and old-fashioned; the red-orange and blue combination can be jarring if not modernized.
Warning icon Supporting text in lighter blue reduces visual harmony and makes certain parts hard to read.

Flame
#E24E2A

Denim
#0147A9

Ebony
#212121

White
#FFFFFF

Color may be holding this logo back. Build a stronger strategic palette before updating the logo.

Build brand colors
3/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon The large 'R' symbol anchors the design on the left, and the core business name balances on the right.

Warning icon Text blocks are uneven in density and alignment below the logo, creating a cluttered effect.
Warning icon The alignment between symbol, wordmark, and taglines lacks cohesion, leading to a visually fragmented appearance.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
2/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon Main 'R' symbol and power icon could work in larger formats such as shop signage or banners.

Warning icon Thin script letters, tagline, and small details will not be legible at reduced scales (e.g. business cards, app icons).
Warning icon Excessive text and intricate layout does not scale well for digital or embroidery use.
Warning icon Gradients and color transitions won't translate to monochrome or low-resolution applications.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

4/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No offensive or inappropriate visual confusion detected.

3 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Both logomark and wordmark relate in color palette and are placed side by side, supporting brand recall.

Warning icon Stylistic mismatch: the brush-stroke, energetic 'R' contrasts with the classical script type, lacking harmony.
Warning icon Sizings feel slightly off, with the logomark drawing more attention than the core wordmark.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo