Ras Computers, The Computer Training Institute…,.. logo review
2.8/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Ras Computers, The Computer Training Institute…,..

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Corporate, Slightly Retro Education
3/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
4/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
2/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Legibility

  • The main business name 'Ras Computers' is prominent in a large, contrasting script font.
  • Supporting text is not overly decorative.
  • The orange-red script font can be difficult to read at a distance or in small formats.
  • Supporting text under the business name becomes very crowded and loses hierarchy, especially the tagline and details.
  • Light blue tagline has low contrast on white background, hurting readability.
2/5

Originality

  • Abstract 'R' integration attempts to provide a unique touch relevant to the business name.
  • Power symbol incorporated in the blue circle is industry-appropriate.
  • Elements like the 'R' swoosh and power button are standard motifs commonly used in tech/education logos.
  • Overall composition feels generic and lacks innovative visual storytelling or memorable uniqueness.
3/5

Color harmony

  • Limited to two main accent colors (orange, blue) with neutral white, offering some consistency.
  • Color palette feels a bit harsh and old-fashioned; the red-orange and blue combination can be jarring if not modernized.
  • Supporting text in lighter blue reduces visual harmony and makes certain parts hard to read.
Flame#E24E2A
Denim#0147A9
Ebony#212121
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
3/5

Balance alignment

  • The large 'R' symbol anchors the design on the left, and the core business name balances on the right.
  • Text blocks are uneven in density and alignment below the logo, creating a cluttered effect.
  • The alignment between symbol, wordmark, and taglines lacks cohesion, leading to a visually fragmented appearance.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2/5

Scalability

  • Main 'R' symbol and power icon could work in larger formats such as shop signage or banners.
  • Thin script letters, tagline, and small details will not be legible at reduced scales (e.g. business cards, app icons).
  • Excessive text and intricate layout does not scale well for digital or embroidery use.
  • Gradients and color transitions won't translate to monochrome or low-resolution applications.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

4/5

Misinterpretations

  • No offensive or inappropriate visual confusion detected.
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Both logomark and wordmark relate in color palette and are placed side by side, supporting brand recall.
  • Stylistic mismatch: the brush-stroke, energetic 'R' contrasts with the classical script type, lacking harmony.
  • Sizings feel slightly off, with the logomark drawing more attention than the core wordmark.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo
Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews