View review
Sakeliga, Kragdag, Doen Jou Eie Ding
Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.
Objective AI feedback. Your creative decision.
Logo performance breakdown
Legibility
Text is bold and highly readable.
Good contrast between text and background.
Originality
Attempts to visualize multiple concepts in icon format.
Each symbol (gear, leaf, droplet, circular arrow) is highly generic within the industry.
No creative integration or negative space interaction among the icons.
Color harmony
The color palette is balanced and fitting for the symbols used.
Contrast is strong between the icons and the background.
Overuse of different colors (four major hues) feels fragmented and could complicate monochrome adaptation.
Orange
#FDA734
Red
#E94F23
Blue
#4296C5
Green
#57B13A
Gray
#747474
Color may be holding this logo back. Build a stronger strategic palette before updating the logo.
Build brand colorsBalance alignment
Main text is horizontally aligned with the icons.
The cluster of four icons creates visual heaviness on the left, making overall balance feel off.
The SAKELIGA mark above the main logotype creates some visual confusion and hierarchy issues.
Scalability
Bold text will scale well for most applications.
Distinct icons are identifiable at medium sizes.
Four small icons with gradients and fine details could lose clarity at very small sizes or in embroidery.
Multi-color palette may not reproduce well in black and white or single-color applications.
200x250 px
100×125 px
50×62 px
Misinterpretations
No inappropriate or problematic shapes detected.
Symbol & text fit
General color harmony between icons and supporting text.
Icons are much smaller in scale than the wordmark, making them secondary and disconnected.
No visual linkage between the icons and the typography.
Wondering how your logo performs?
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.