SAKELIGA, KragDag, doen jou eie ding logo review
3.1 / 5
Logo score
Logo review of

Sakeliga, Kragdag, Doen Jou Eie Ding

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Objective AI feedback. Your creative decision.

Combination Mark Modern, Illustrative Event
5/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

5/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon Text is bold and highly readable.
Checkmark icon Good contrast between text and background.

2/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Attempts to visualize multiple concepts in icon format.

Warning icon Each symbol (gear, leaf, droplet, circular arrow) is highly generic within the industry.
Warning icon No creative integration or negative space interaction among the icons.

3/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon The color palette is balanced and fitting for the symbols used.
Checkmark icon Contrast is strong between the icons and the background.

Warning icon Overuse of different colors (four major hues) feels fragmented and could complicate monochrome adaptation.

Orange
#FDA734

Red
#E94F23

Blue
#4296C5

Green
#57B13A

Gray
#747474

Color may be holding this logo back. Build a stronger strategic palette before updating the logo.

Build brand colors
3/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Main text is horizontally aligned with the icons.

Warning icon The cluster of four icons creates visual heaviness on the left, making overall balance feel off.
Warning icon The SAKELIGA mark above the main logotype creates some visual confusion and hierarchy issues.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
3/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon Bold text will scale well for most applications.
Checkmark icon Distinct icons are identifiable at medium sizes.

Warning icon Four small icons with gradients and fine details could lose clarity at very small sizes or in embroidery.
Warning icon Multi-color palette may not reproduce well in black and white or single-color applications.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or problematic shapes detected.

2 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon General color harmony between icons and supporting text.

Warning icon Icons are much smaller in scale than the wordmark, making them secondary and disconnected.
Warning icon No visual linkage between the icons and the typography.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo