INTEGRIA IMPEX logo review
4.2/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Integria Impex

Distinctive, professional logo with only minor refinements needed for scalability and typographic unity.

Combination Mark Modern, Abstract, Professional Corporate Services
4.5/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
4.5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Refine small-scale clarity of abstract mark

Medium priority Low effort

Ensures symbol remains clear at all sizes.

Improves versatility in various applications.

2

Harmonize weight and spacing between 'IMPEX' and other elements

Low priority Low effort

Minor spacing and alignment fixes aid professional finish.

Adds polish to presentation and cohesion.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Sector Appropriateness

    Professional and fitting for corporate and B2B applications.

  • Distinctiveness

    Visually distinct in a formal landscape.

4.5/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark is highly readable and well-spaced.
  • Typography is clean and modern.
  • Minor variation in spacing between 'IMPEX' and 'INTEGRIA' could be refined.
4/5

Originality

  • Abstract mark is distinctive and not generic.
  • Uncommon mark construction for sector.
  • Abstract mark could be interpreted as generic without context.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Green and black are harmonious and professional.
  • Color choice supports trust and growth themes.
  • Limited palette—could experiment with secondary contrast for flexibility.
Green#165B3C
Black#000000
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Good vertical alignment of mark and wordmark.
  • Balanced composition creates a cohesive unit.
  • Slight mismatch in weight between the symbol and 'IMPEX' text.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Mark and wordmark retain clarity at small sizes.
  • Simplicity aids versatile use.
  • Fine lines in the mark might reduce clarity at very small scale.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

4.5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No clear risk of negative or inappropriate interpretations.
  • Symbol communicates positivity and connection.
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and wordmark complement each other stylistically.
  • Professional cohesion between elements.
  • Symbol meaning is not immediately obvious without supporting brand narrative.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo