4/5

Logo score

Logo review of

Studio

A distinctive and thematically strong photography studio logo that could benefit from minor adjustments to clarity at small sizes.

Combination Modern, Geometric, Negative Space Integration Photography

3.5/5

Legibility

4/5

Originality

5/5

Misread

4/5

Balance

3.5/5

Scale

Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

lettermark / Standalone mark (top band)

Test and refine the legibility of the initials, possibly by subtly adjusting the forms for clearer letter separation.

Optional refinement High priority Medium effort

Area to inspectApproximate location

The 'RL' can be challenging to decipher at first glance due to the abstract geometric construction, especially for unfamiliar viewers.

How to check

Gather feedback on initial legibility among new viewers.

See the category review

Standalone mark (top band)

Test the symbol at reduced sizes to ensure all critical details remain identifiable.

Worth testing Medium priority Medium effort

Area to inspectApproximate location

Some thin gaps and detailed segments in the camera/lens stylization might be lost at small sizes.

How to check

Review print and digital mockups at various sizes and backgrounds.

See the category review

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Brief & logo match

Based on your brief

Compared with

Photography; logo should clearly link to the field and offer a custom look.

The camera-driven design fits photography well, with minor legibility limits for broader recognition.

Industry Relevance
The camera shape and aperture details directly communicate photography.
Initial Integration
The 'RL' initials are meaningfully combined with the camera symbolism, creating a custom mark.

3.5/5

Legibility

Clear 'STUDIO' text
Creative integration of letters and symbol

The 'RL' can be challenging to decipher at first glance due to the abstract geometric construction, especially for unfamiliar viewers.

Optional refinement lettermark / Standalone mark (top band)

Try: Test and refine the legibility of the initials, possibly by subtly adjusting the forms for clearer letter separation.

Check: Gather feedback on initial legibility among new viewers.

Area to inspectApproximate location

4/5

Originality

Distinctive treatment by merging initials with a camera concept

4/5

Balance alignment

Good proportional relationship between symbol and wordmark
Clean alignment of elements

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3.5/5

Scalability

Strong silhouette at moderate sizes

Some thin gaps and detailed segments in the camera/lens stylization might be lost at small sizes.

Worth testing Standalone mark (top band)

Try: Test the symbol at reduced sizes to ensure all critical details remain identifiable.

Check: Review print and digital mockups at various sizes and backgrounds.

Area to inspectApproximate location

200 × 250 px

100 × 125 px

50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

No unintended readings apparent

4/5

Symbol & text fit

Harmonious relationship; type sits well beneath the mark

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo

Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews

View review