CIGOGNE, DEPUIS 1929 logo review
3.9 / 5
Logo score
Logo review of

Cigogne, Depuis 1929

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Objective AI feedback. Your creative decision.

Combination Mark Retro, Illustrative, Bold, Outlined Food & Beverage
4/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
3/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon CIGOGNE lettering is bold, readable, and well-contrasted against the white background.
Checkmark icon The supporting text 'DEPUIS 1929' is cleanly placed and readable within the circle.

Warning icon Shadow effect on the wordmark slightly reduces clarity at small sizes.
Warning icon The narrow spacing in the supporting text inside the circle could be difficult to read when scaled down.

4/5

Originality

Checkmark icon Unique stork illustration is uncommon and relevant to the name 'CIGOGNE'.
Checkmark icon Retro illustrative style gives it character and specificity.

Warning icon The circle + animal emblem approach is somewhat traditional and seen in legacy food brands.
Warning icon No clever use of negative space or integrated letterforms.

4/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Consistent use of navy, orange, and white is visually pleasant and recognizable.
Checkmark icon High contrast ensures visibility.

Warning icon Orange background within the circle may clash with certain backgrounds if used out of context.
Warning icon Bold orange can feel overpowering if not balanced in all brand materials.

Orange
#FF6600

White
#FFFFFF

Dark Blue
#1A237E

Your palette is close. Refine the color roles and combinations before updating the logo.

Build brand colors
3/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Circular frame provides a sense of containment and balance.
Checkmark icon The stork and text are centered to each other.

Warning icon The stork's beak and legs break out of the circle and off-center slightly, making the composition feel unbalanced.
Warning icon The drop shadow of the wordmark adds visual weight to the bottom, disrupting the vertical harmony.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
3/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon The main stork symbol is simple enough at moderate sizes and stands out.
Checkmark icon Can work well on print packaging or mid-sized signage.

Warning icon Illustrated detail in wings and small text inside the circle will be lost on small sizes like favicons or embroidery.
Warning icon Drop shadow and thick outlining may cause issues at miniature scale.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or misleading symbols. Stork is clear and benign.

4 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Color and outline styles between bird illustration and wordmark match well.
Checkmark icon Circle acts as visual anchor for both elements.

Warning icon Relative sizing could be refined—the wordmark feels heavy in relation to the contained logo above.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo