CYBER DELORME MAYOTTE logo review
4.3/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Cyber Delorme Mayotte

Distinctive, relevant, and professionally executed blend of tradition and technology; well-suited for a knowledgeable, modern brand.

Combination Mark Modern Illustrative With Tech Motifs Technology/education
5/5
Legibility
4.5/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Simplify neural network details in the mark for better visibility at small sizes

High priority Medium effort

The intricate network lines risk disappearing or blurring in smaller applications.

Improves scalability and logo versatility

2

Harmonize illustration and font style further if needed

Medium priority Low effort

A slight disconnect remains between the illustrative flourish and the flat, bold font style.

Unifies professional impression

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Sector Fit

    Illustrates the fusion of technology and communication/education well.

5/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark is clear and easy to read
  • Font is bold with excellent spacing
4.5/5

Originality

  • Creative blend of traditional and tech imagery
  • Uncommon illustrative style for the sector
4.5/5

Color harmony

  • Modern teal and tan palette feels fresh and professional
Teal#185A6C
Tan#E6CBA8
Dark Gray#2B3440

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Strong central alignment between mark and text
  • Mark does not overpower wordmark
  • Slight complexity in the mark can feel visually heavier on the right
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3.5/5

Scalability

  • Central mark remains recognizable at medium size
  • Fine lines in the neural network detail may be lost at small sizes
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No negative or confusing alternate readings
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and wordmark both convey a harmonious tech-forward identity
  • Minor style difference in illustration vs. text could be refined

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo