DAY BANK logo review
4.1 / 5
Logo score
Logo review of

Day Bank

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Modern Geometric Finance
4/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Legibility

Checkmark icon The English text 'DAY BANK' is clear and easy to read despite its geometric stylization.
Checkmark icon Contrast between the text and background is sufficient.

Warning icon The Persian script is a bit stylized and may present a minor readability challenge for unfamiliar viewers.
Warning icon Geometric style on the English text might cause momentary pause to decipher certain letters, like 'A' and 'N'.

4/5

Originality

Checkmark icon The mark cleverly combines infinity and letterform motifs for a distinct corporate feel.
Checkmark icon Combining an infinity loop with a partial 'b' or 'd' is innovative among financial logos.

Warning icon Infinity symbols are somewhat common in finance and tech sectors, slightly reducing uniqueness.
Warning icon Geometric script is not completely one-of-a-kind for bilingual marks, though well-executed here.

5/5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Harmonious use of a single accent color and neutral gray, keeping the brand professional and consistent.
Checkmark icon Excellent color/User interface balance for legibility.

Lochinvar
#08949B

Gray
#888888

White
#FFFFFF

4/5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon The vertical stacking of symbol and bilingual wordmark creates a clear hierarchy.
Checkmark icon The elements feel visually stable and centered.

Warning icon The symbol is heavy and dominant compared to the wordmarks below, which might create a slight feeling of top-heaviness.
Warning icon Minor alignment improvement could generate better balance, particularly in space distribution between script and wordmark.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
3/5

Scalability

Checkmark icon The logomark is clean, bold, and simple enough to be scalable.
Checkmark icon Would reproduce well on medium-to-large applications such as signage or print collateral.

Warning icon Thinner line parts and gaps in the geometric wordmarks (especially in the Persian type) may lose clarity in very small applications such as favicons or embroidery.
Warning icon The complexity of the mark could get lost in tiny use-cases, especially when viewed at a distance.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

5/5

Misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or accidental imagery detected in the composition.

4 / 5

Symbol & text fit

Checkmark icon Both logomark and wordmarks utilize geometric styles, making them visually compatible.
Checkmark icon Color choice and thickness transitions are cohesive.

Warning icon Logomark’s boldness slightly outshines the thinner line work of the wordmarks below, so they could be weighted more harmoniously.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo