DAY BANK logo review
4.1/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Day Bank

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Combination Mark Modern Geometric Finance
4/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Legibility

  • The English text 'DAY BANK' is clear and easy to read despite its geometric stylization.
  • Contrast between the text and background is sufficient.
  • The Persian script is a bit stylized and may present a minor readability challenge for unfamiliar viewers.
  • Geometric style on the English text might cause momentary pause to decipher certain letters, like 'A' and 'N'.
4/5

Originality

  • The mark cleverly combines infinity and letterform motifs for a distinct corporate feel.
  • Combining an infinity loop with a partial 'b' or 'd' is innovative among financial logos.
  • Infinity symbols are somewhat common in finance and tech sectors, slightly reducing uniqueness.
  • Geometric script is not completely one-of-a-kind for bilingual marks, though well-executed here.
5/5

Color harmony

  • Harmonious use of a single accent color and neutral gray, keeping the brand professional and consistent.
  • Excellent color/User interface balance for legibility.
Lochinvar#08949B
Gray#888888
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • The vertical stacking of symbol and bilingual wordmark creates a clear hierarchy.
  • The elements feel visually stable and centered.
  • The symbol is heavy and dominant compared to the wordmarks below, which might create a slight feeling of top-heaviness.
  • Minor alignment improvement could generate better balance, particularly in space distribution between script and wordmark.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3/5

Scalability

  • The logomark is clean, bold, and simple enough to be scalable.
  • Would reproduce well on medium-to-large applications such as signage or print collateral.
  • Thinner line parts and gaps in the geometric wordmarks (especially in the Persian type) may lose clarity in very small applications such as favicons or embroidery.
  • The complexity of the mark could get lost in tiny use-cases, especially when viewed at a distance.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or accidental imagery detected in the composition.
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Both logomark and wordmarks utilize geometric styles, making them visually compatible.
  • Color choice and thickness transitions are cohesive.
  • Logomark’s boldness slightly outshines the thinner line work of the wordmarks below, so they could be weighted more harmoniously.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo
Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews