A distinctive and bold wordmark with clever typographic play, but verify legibility for all audiences due to the numeral substitution.
This wordmark shows solid execution, supported by distinctive construction and clarity at smaller sizes; improving text readability is the clearest next step.
Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.
within bounds, substitute '11' for 'i'
Logo preview unavailable. The written feedback is still available on this card.
The use of two colored vertical bars ('11') as the letter 'i' is legible but may be momentarily confusing and could be misread as numerals.
See the category reviewThere isn't enough brand context to assess the match.
Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.
Create a full color palette using these colors
Create new paletteThis review includes a score but no supporting explanation for this category.
Does the shape still work without color?
Preparing artwork...
Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.
Compare the mark and lettering on each surface.
Shows the lower-contrast areas of the logo (5th percentile). Tiny details may have lower contrast. Good ≥ 4.5:1 · Medium ≥ 3:1 · Bad < 3:1. A visual guide, not an accessibility rating.
A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.
Look for clear separation between shapes and a distinctive outline.
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.
More credits needed
Add credits to continue without losing your work.
Then $7/month. Cancel anytime.
Essential logo review with AI
Estimated progress
