Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of ONCF

Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Detected text:
Business industry:
Review requested by Bavono29
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Legibility
Bold, sans-serif type is highly legible.
Strong contrast between orange text and white background.
Scalability versatility
Logo is relatively simple and should scale well for most applications.
Solid performance on digital and print platforms such as billboards, station signage, and websites.
Brush stroke effect may lose detail or become less clear at very small sizes, such as favicons or embroidery.

200x250 px

100×125 px

50×62 px
Balance alignment
Good overall balance between the symbol and the wordmark.
Left-aligned swoosh complements right-aligned bold type.
Swoosh symbol may overpower the text slightly due to its size and energetic styling.


Originality
Movement and speed are communicated through unique swoosh marks.
Simple yet recognizable approach.
Swoosh designs are somewhat common in the transportation industry and among global logos.
Concept is not highly unique or memorable.
Logomark wordmark fit
Symbol and wordmark share the same dynamic energy via color and weight.
Cohesive use of one bright color unifies symbol and wordmark.
Swooshes could be further stylized to reinforce connection to trains or rails for better synergy.
Aesthetic look
Logo feels modern and impactful.
Strong, clean execution makes it visually appealing.
Brush strokes, while dynamic, could be perceived as generic or unfinished by some viewers.
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
No inappropriate or unintentional interpretations detected.
Color harmony
Single bright orange color ensures harmony and clear brand recognition.
High contrast against white background.
Orange
#FF6600
White
#FFFFFF