Logo review of SOCIAL MEDIA AM

Legibility

The main initials 'AM' are legible and prominent.
The overall color contrast is strong, ensuring visibility.

The 'SOCIAL MEDIA' text is small, curved, and could become illegible at smaller sizes.
Text styles clash, resulting in reduced readability for the business name.

Scalability versatility

Simple use of black and white allows for easy reproduction in most mediums.

The thin font on 'SOCIAL MEDIA' and overall line weight of the speech bubble could vanish or blur at small sizes (such as business cards or social media avatars).
Handwritten 'AM' may lose definition in embroidery or favicons.

Balance alignment

The speech bubble provides a central frame, offering some visual containment.

The top 'SOCIAL MEDIA' text feels awkwardly placed and disrupts the logo's vertical balance.
The 'AM' lettering overlaps and nearly touches the boundaries, lacking comfortable breathing space.
Curved top text and flat baseline 'AM' result in misaligned visual flow.

Originality

Handwritten script gives a casual and human touch.

Speech bubble icons are clichéd choices for social media and communication brands.
There is no unique twist or hidden meaning, making the logo generic.

Logomark wordmark fit

Both wordmark and logomark are integrated inside the speech bubble, creating a single composition.

The styles of 'SOCIAL MEDIA' (serif, all-caps, arched) and 'AM' (bold handwritten) conflict, resulting in a mismatch.
Size difference and placement feel forced rather than naturally integrated.

Aesthetic look

Clean, monochrome look avoids visual clutter.

Clashing text styles and awkward spacing detract from the overall aesthetic.
The design feels busy inside the limited bubble space.
Generic use of industry clichés (speech bubble).

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

No inappropriate or accidental imagery detected.

Color harmony

Monochrome color palette ensures effortless harmony and maximum contrast.
Easy to use on various backgrounds.