SUBROOFFICIAL logo review
3.7/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Subroofficial

Client-facing in digital spaces but needs simplification and polish to reach full professional standard.

Combination Mark Modern Gradient Tech Gaming
4/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Redesign gradients and reduce glow for improved scalability and print versatility.

High priority Medium effort

Current effects limit reproduction; simplifying colors and removing glows enhances utility without losing impact.

Improves usability in all brand settings, especially at small sizes or in one-color applications.

2

Refine gradient transitions and color polish to increase perceived quality.

Medium priority Low effort

Smoother blends and minor color adjustments make the logo look more premium and intentional.

Elevates aesthetic and differentiates from generic gaming marks.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Detected Industry

    Style, color, and symbol fit a gaming or eSports context well. Modern and energetic approach works for digital brands.

4/5

Legibility

  • Text is readable with a futuristic font.
  • Strong color contrast between 'SUBROOFFICIAL' and the background.
  • Gradient color on 'OFFICIAL' portion could slightly reduce clarity at small sizes.
3/5

Originality

  • Stylized S is dynamic and slightly unique.
  • Sharp-angled letterforms and gradient effects are commonly seen in gaming logos.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Cyan and red are complementary and evoke a tech/gaming vibe.
  • Gradient transition is abrupt and could be smoother for a more polished look.
Turquoise#45DFE9
Red#EE4848
DarkGray#24262D

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Mark and wordmark are well centered and aligned.
  • Circular containing shape creates strong focus.
  • Glowing edge adds visual weight that might unbalance the mark in certain applications.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3/5

Scalability

  • Icon is simple and bold, should scale well.
  • Gradients and glow effect may not reproduce well in one-color or small-scale applications.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or unintended shapes detected.
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Font style and color palette match the design of the icon.
  • Minor disconnect in sharpness between logomark and slightly softer text.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo