Terjit services logo review
3.9/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Terjit Services

Not ready for final presentation; requires improvements to text legibility and possibly more distinctive iconography.

Combination Mark Minimalist Geometric Services
4/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Increase the size and prominence of the 'services' text or explore alternative placement to improve legibility.

High priority Low effort

The small 'services' text reduces overall legibility, especially at scale.

medium

2

Explore tweaks to the icon for increased uniqueness, potentially integrating elements that more clearly connect to the specific services provided.

Medium priority Medium effort

Current icon is visually sound but only moderately original; added specificity could help brand differentiation.

medium

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4/5

Legibility

  • Primary word 'Terjit' is highly readable with clear typography.
  • The word 'services' is much smaller and may be hard to read at small sizes.
3/5

Originality

  • Combination of palm and shopping bag is moderately unique.
  • Hexagon and palm tree with bag handle is somewhat generic for travel or retail themes.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Consistent use of shades of purple creates a unified appearance.
  • Purple gradient may present issues in simple black/white or single color versions.
Purple#A020F0
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Mark and wordmark are well aligned on a horizontal axis.
  • Hexagonal icon has balanced internal elements.
  • The small 'services' text appears uneven and slightly detached from the main wordmark.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Simple geometric shapes promote scalability.
  • Minimal detail in icon ensures legibility at small sizes.
  • Small 'services' text may be lost at small scale.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or embarrassing dual meanings detected.
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and wordmark share color and a modern feel.
  • The shopping bag and palm trees may not clearly relate to broader 'services' unless clarified in context.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo