Refine the logomark to increase optical harmony with wordmark, possibly adjusting weight or connection.
Mark currently slightly outweighs the logotype.
Improves visual unity and professional polish.
Logo score
Logo review of
Classic Graphic | Design | Studio
Strong client-grade logo; can be improved for polish and versatility.
Legibility
Originality
Misread
Balance
Scale
Your next steps
What to fix first
Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.
Consider slightly increasing tagline text size or adjusting contrast for better clarity at smaller sizes.
Tagline may be hard to read when reduced.
Increases usability for small-scale or digital applications.
Detailed review
Logo performance breakdown
—Not scored
Brief & logo match
From the original review- Clean, Unique Style Typography
Typography is clean and visually distinct, aided by stylized 'i' and geometric 'C'.
- C Letter Mark, Strong Icon
C in circle is recognizable and bold, fitting the brief for a memorable 'C' icon.
- Dark Blue, Trustable Premium Creative Message
Palette and styling communicate premium and trustworthy qualities.
Legibility
- All text is very clear and easy to read.
- Good contrast with dark background.
Originality
- Custom elements in the 'i' and circular 'C' mark.
- The overall composition is fairly typical for design studios, not highly unique.
Color harmony
- Dark blue with white provides a trustworthy and premium feel.
- One-color palette may limit vibrancy across diverse backgrounds.
Prussian Blue#101C4B
White#FFFFFF
Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.
Create a full color palette using these colors
Create new paletteBalance alignment
- Even horizontal alignment between mark and wordmark.
- Consistent baseline and spacing.
- Logomark is slightly heavier than wordmark, marginally affecting optical balance.
Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.
Scalability
- Mark and wordmark are simple and bold, scalable for most sizes.
- Small text in tagline may become less readable at small scale.
Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.
Misinterpretations
- No evident inappropriate or confusing shape associations.
Symbol & text fit
- 'C' symbol and wordmark are clearly related and cohesive.
- Abstract mark feels only loosely integrated with word flow.
Black & white
Does the shape still work without color?
These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.
Background contrast
Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.
These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.
Blur & silhouette
A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.
These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.
Try your own review
Review my logo
Wondering how your logo performs?
Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.
Keep exploring
