delica* logo review
3.4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Delica*

Review the detailed scores below to see what is working and what should be refined first.

Wordmark Handwritten, Playful Food
3/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
2/5
Balance
2/5
Scale
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

3/5

Legibility

  • Most letters are distinguishable at medium to large sizes.
  • The playful, handwritten feel adds personality.
  • The final 'a' is overly stylized and may be confused with an 'o' or decorative flourish, impacting fast readability.
  • The asterisk as the dot on the 'i' slightly disrupts simple reading.
  • Thin and inconsistent line thickness reduces clarity at small sizes.
4/5

Originality

  • Distinctive handwritten character and use of the asterisk for the 'i' dot adds a unique twist.
  • Swash on the 'a' is memorable despite legibility tradeoff.
  • Handwritten wordmarks are commonly used in the food industry for 'friendly' brands.
  • No additional creative use of negative space or multilevel symbolism.
5/5

Color harmony

  • Only a single color (black) is used, making for strong contrast and universal applicability.
  • Works on both light and dark backgrounds.
Black#000000
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
2/5

Balance alignment

  • Loose alignment supports the playful style.
  • The exaggerated heights (especially the 'l'), the uneven baselines, and the oversized final 'a' make the logo feel unbalanced.
  • Visual weight is too heavy on the right side due to the oversized 'a' flourish.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2/5

Scalability

  • Simple color scheme enhances potential for versatile application.
  • Thin line weight will struggle on small surfaces like business cards, pens, or embroidery.
  • Excessively stylized 'a' may lose definition at smaller scales or in print.
  • Not suitable for favicon or mobile app icon due to lack of boldness and minute details.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious inappropriate double meanings or problematic shapes are present.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo
Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews