Abstract symmetrical mark forming both a fountain .. logo review
3.5/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Abstract Symmetrical Mark Forming Both A Fountain ..

A visually striking and conceptually clever logo with some risk of misinterpretation that warrants real-audience testing.

Standalone Mark Minimalist Double-meaning Mark Literary / Publishing / Creative
4.5/5
Originality
2/5
Misread
5/5
Balance
3.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Standalone mark

Test with target audiences for unintended sexual or intimate connotations.

Visible issue High priority Medium effort
Area to inspectApproximate location

The mark’s suggestive human body form may be interpreted as intimate or potentially provocative, depending on context.

How to check

Gather feedback on audience perception and appropriateness.

See the category review
2

Standalone mark

Test clarity and integrity at reduced sizes and in print.

Worth testing Medium priority Low effort
Area to inspectApproximate location

Fine tip details in the pen nib area may risk legibility and unity at small sizes.

How to check

Confirm if the tip and outline remain distinct and recognizable.

See the category review
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

More context needed

There isn't enough brand context to assess the match.

4.5/5

Originality

  • Distinctive fusion of a human silhouette and a pen nib.
  • Memorable minimalist execution.
5/5

Balance alignment

  • Perfect symmetry and visual harmony.
  • Centralized composition.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3.5/5

Scalability

  • Simple lines support reduction.
  • Overall boldness aids reproduction.

  • Fine tip details in the pen nib area may risk legibility and unity at small sizes.

    Worth testing Standalone mark

    Try: Test clarity and integrity at reduced sizes and in print.

    Check: Confirm if the tip and outline remain distinct and recognizable.

    Area to inspectApproximate location
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

2/5

Misinterpretations

  • The mark’s suggestive human body form may be interpreted as intimate or potentially provocative, depending on context.

    Visible issue Standalone mark

    Try: Test with target audiences for unintended sexual or intimate connotations.

    Check: Gather feedback on audience perception and appropriateness.

    Area to inspectApproximate location

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo
Keep exploring

Discover other logo reviews