PEMUDA PEMUDI TAMAN REJO PPK logo review
3/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Pemuda Pemudi Taman Rejo Ppk

Visually coherent and appropriate, but weakened by inconsistent visual language and fine detail. Removing or harmonizing the snack image and clarifying the smaller emblem would elevate it to a stronger professional standard.

Emblem Modern Abstract Emblem With Celebratory Motif Community/youth Organization
3.5/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
4/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
2.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Remove or restyle top snack element to match emblem illustration or omit for visual coherence.

High priority Low effort

Photographic insert feels out of place and weakens polish.

Improves overall balance and style fitness.

2

Simplify or enlarge the small 'PPK' inner emblem for small-scale readability.

Medium priority Medium effort

Small elements are lost at small scale and limit reproduction versatility.

Boosts visibility and professional presence at varying sizes.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Community Symbolism

    Success in conveying unity and organized activity.

3.5/5

Legibility

  • Outer wordmarks are readable and well-placed.
  • Small central letters ('PPK') lack clarity at smaller sizes.
3/5

Originality

  • Abstract human figure adds some distinctiveness.
  • Emblem structure and laurel symbolize common visual tropes; overall concept feels conventional.
3.5/5

Color harmony

  • Bold blue, red, and yellow palette creates energy and contrast.
  • Top photographic snack does not harmonize with the illustrated style.
DarkBlue#253A72
Red#E53F3F
Orange#EBA51B
Cream#F7EEDF
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Symmetrical laurel branches and circular badge create strong balance.
  • Main abstract figure is centered.
  • Top floating element (snack) disrupts visual flow and balance.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2.5/5

Scalability

  • Main emblem and type are generally clear at moderate sizes.
  • Small 'PPK' emblem and fine laurel details risk losing clarity at small scale.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

4/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious misinterpretation or negative space issues.
3.5/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Circular text and main abstract mark integrate cohesively.
  • Smaller inner emblem feels visually crowded and less intentional.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo