SANG SAKA Siswa Andalan Generasi Sains Karya Anak logo review
4.2/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Sang Saka Siswa Andalan Generasi Sains Karya Anak

A distinctive, coherent education/science logo with strong professionalism and only minor readability and originality concerns.

Combination Mark Modern Educational Badge Education
4.5/5
Legibility
3.5/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4.5/5
Balance
4/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Increase tagline weight or simplify for small-scale use

Medium priority Low effort

Tagline loses clarity at small sizes; slight font weight or simplification can help without costly redesign

Improves readability and consistency across sizes

2

Review color contrast/accessibility for thin yellow elements

Low priority Low effort

Some gold elements may lack enough contrast against white at smaller sizes

Minor improvement for universal visibility

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Education/science Brand Association

    Very strong—clear science, learning, and achievement symbolism

  • Target Youth/student Audience

    Modern palette and uplifting forms feel appropriate for young learners

4.5/5

Legibility

  • Main wordmark is bold, highly readable
  • Tagline is clear at moderate sizes
  • Tagline may become difficult to read at very small sizes
3.5/5

Originality

  • Cohesive integration of book, atom, and star is visually distinctive
  • Science-education motifs (books, atoms, rising stars) are common in the sector; some elements are familiar
4.5/5

Color harmony

  • Palette is harmonious and appropriate for education/aspirational themes
  • Gold/yellow contrasts nicely but minor value tweaks could improve accessibility
Navy Blue#122457
Gold#FFD02C
Teal#2EC4B6
Light Blue#29ABE2

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4.5/5

Balance alignment

  • Strong central symmetry and focus
  • Good visual hierarchy from mark to name to tagline
  • Circular framing may feel heavy compared to airier inner elements
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

4/5

Scalability

  • Mark and type are clear and maintain integrity when reduced
  • Some small decorative elements (stars, atom dots) may lose clarity at small scale
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No plausible negative or confusing interpretations
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Both elements complement each other conceptually and stylistically
  • Color difference between mark and tagline could be more unified

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo