Silvia Amaya Nuestra diversidad, nuestra mayor for.. logo review
3.3/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Silvia Amaya Nuestra Diversidad, Nuestra Mayor For..

Serviceable for a university campaign; needs stronger distinctiveness and scalability.

Wordmark Modern Script And Sans-serif Mix Education
4/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Strengthen brand distinctiveness by refining or customizing the script and sans-serif combination.

High priority Medium effort

Current style feels generic; a more unique treatment would boost differentiation.

Clarifies candidate identity and improves memorability.

2

Increase tagline legibility at small sizes, potentially by adjusting size or simplifying.

Medium priority Low effort

Tagline and underline are at risk of disappearing at small scale.

Ensures clear communication in all applications.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • University Rector Campaign

    Appropriate level of professionalism and inclusivity, but could show more gravitas or uniqueness to stand out in institutional context.

4/5

Legibility

  • Primary text is readable with clear color contrast.
  • Tagline in uppercase is easy to read.
  • Handwritten script and differing weights create minor legibility challenges between sections.
3/5

Originality

  • Script and clean sans-serif mix creates moderate distinction.
  • Style and combination are somewhat templated and not highly unique.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Two-tone main palette is harmonious and consistent.
  • Palette is pleasant but not striking; could use a stronger accent.
Orchid#E27BA3
Balanced Blue#264654
White#FFFFFF

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Clean horizontal alignment between wordmark and tagline.
  • Consistent baseline for main elements.
  • Balance slightly affected by mixing very different script and geometric sans-serif.
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3/5

Scalability

  • Simple color scheme and clear wordmark.
  • Tagline text and underline may become unreadable at small sizes.
  • Thin script strokes could be lost when reduced.
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No inappropriate or confusing dual meanings detected.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo