sms mojo logo review
3.4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Sms Mojo

Serviceable for low-competition contexts, but needs a more distinctive symbol for a credible tech/AI automation brand.

Combination Mark Clean, Modern, Geometric Tech/software
4/5
Legibility
3/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Refine the symbol for more distinctiveness or a clearer connection to messaging/automation.

High priority Medium effort

Symbol is highly generic and could blend in with competitors.

Increases memorability and avoids generic looks in tech.

2

Ensure gradients and small color dots in the mark and 'j' are optimized for very small sizes or provide a flat-color alternate version.

Medium priority Low effort

Gradients and tiny details may not print or display well when small.

Improves practical usage and brand consistency across scales.

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

From the original review
  • Automation/tech Focus

    Visual elements are fitting for AI or software, but the symbol is generic.

  • Approachable And Modern

    Overall effect is modern and friendly due to color and rounded type.

4/5

Legibility

  • All letters are clean and instantly readable
  • Distinct separation between 'sms' and 'mojo'
  • Small lime accent over the 'j' may lose visibility at tiny scales
3/5

Originality

  • Slightly custom wordmark with linked style
  • Geometric block icon is generic; similar marks are common in tech and communication
3.5/5

Color harmony

  • Consistent green gradient evokes tech/automation
  • Heavy reliance on standard green gradients; not distinctive
Green#64B832
Dark Green#23812D
Lime#E8F432

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Good left-right alignment between symbol and wordmark
  • Consistent vertical centering
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3.5/5

Scalability

  • Strong main forms retain shape at small-to-medium sizes
  • Fine gradient and small dot accents may not reproduce well at small sizes
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No plausible alternative or embarrassing readings
4/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Mark and type share rounded corners and modern aesthetics

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo