Stensund FOLKHÖGSKOLAN VID HAVET logo review
4/5
Logo score
Logo review of

Stensund Folkhögskolan Vid Havet

A strong, modern logo with a memorable, abstract educational symbol that is ready for use but needs testing at small scales.

Combination Modern Geometric Wordmark With Abstract Symbol Education
5/5
Legibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Misread
4/5
Balance
3.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Standalone mark

Verify legibility of striped circles at small and digital sizes.

Worth testing High priority Medium effort
Area to inspectApproximate location

Fine horizontal lines in the symbol may get lost at small sizes or in low-resolution reproduction.

How to check

Test scaled-down versions for line clarity.

See the category review
2

Standalone mark and wordmark

Test horizontal spacing in various lockups and sizes.

Optional refinement Medium priority Low effort

The gap between the circles and wordmark is visually balanced but could feel slightly tight as sizes change.

How to check

Visually assess negative space at multiple scales.

See the category review
Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

4.5/5

Brief & logo match

Based on your brief
Compared with

School

Logo is well suited to a school context with a modern, trustworthy, and memorable construction.

  • School Identity

    Design is professional, modern, and expands well to educational uses, supporting school credibility.

  • Memorability

    Dual colored circles create a distinct icon that is easy to recall for a school brand.

5/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark and tagline are crisp and easy to read.
4/5

Originality

  • Overlapping dual-colored circles with lines offers a recognizable and unique mark.
4/5

Color harmony

  • Red and blue contrast sharply and echo a classic, trustworthy palette.
Red#E3413B
Blue#324C8D
Black#232323

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
4/5

Balance alignment

  • Strong alignment between symbol and wordmark.
  • The gap between the circles and wordmark is visually balanced but could feel slightly tight as sizes change.

    Optional refinement Standalone mark and wordmark

    Try: Test horizontal spacing in various lockups and sizes.

    Check: Visually assess negative space at multiple scales.

Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

3.5/5

Scalability

  • Geometric mark shrinks well in theory.
  • Fine horizontal lines in the symbol may get lost at small sizes or in low-resolution reproduction.

    Worth testing Standalone mark

    Try: Verify legibility of striped circles at small and digital sizes.

    Check: Test scaled-down versions for line clarity.

    Area to inspectApproximate location
Uploaded logo at 200 pixels wide
200 × 250 px
Uploaded logo at 100 pixels wide
100 × 125 px
Uploaded logo at 50 pixels wide
50 × 63 px

Compare the detail at different sizes. Labels show the full image dimensions.

5/5

Misinterpretations

  • No distracting alternative readings.
5/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Abstract symbol integrates cleanly with the educational brand wordmark.

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

Preparing artwork...

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

Compare the mark and lettering on each surface.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

Original
3px blur

Look for clear separation between shapes and a distinctive outline.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo