tv variex logo review
2.7/5
Logo score

tv variex

Functional but generic and visually outdated; requires simplification and more distinctiveness to compete in professional media branding.

Combination Mark 3D Gradient, Geometric Sans-serif Media
4/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
3.5/5
Balance
2.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Simplify the spherical 'X' symbol and reduce gradient reliance

High priority Medium effort

Current style limits versatility and feels derivative. A flat, abstracted mark would be more distinctive and easier to reproduce.

Improves scalability, modernity, and differentiation

2

Increase contrast in the wordmark

Medium priority Low effort

Current grey-on-white risks poor legibility in many contexts.

Improves readability and accessibility, especially in digital and print applications

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

Reflects diversity with rainbow colors but lacks unique identity; relies on generic forms familiar in tech/media.

4/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark is highly readable with geometric typeface
  • Grey color reduces contrast, especially against light backgrounds
2/5

Originality

  • Rainbow gradient adds some uniqueness
  • Spherical mark with 'X' is very reminiscent of well-known tech branding
  • 3D ball and generic font feel derivative
3/5

Color harmony

  • Rainbow gradient is harmonious and eye-catching
  • Heavy reliance on gradients limits versatility and complicates printing
Silver#B8B8B8
Red#CF2A1B
Yellow#F9E384
Green#56B168
Blue#392B93
Black#000000

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
3.5/5

Balance alignment

  • Central alignment of mark and wordmark
  • Size relationship between mark and wordmark feels slightly top-heavy
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2.5/5

Scalability

  • Simple geometric shapes within wordmark
  • 3D effects and gradients complicate reproduction at small sizes
  • Sphere with gradients could lose detail when reduced
4/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious offensive or confusing negative space
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Both elements are geometric, sharing visual language
  • Styling of 'X' symbol and wordmark visually connect but lack a unified concept

Black & white

Does the shape still work without color?

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Background contrast

Find the surfaces where your logo stays clear.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Blur & silhouette

A 3px blur softens fine details so you can check whether the overall shape stays recognizable. If key gaps close or elements merge, the logo may rely too heavily on detail.

These tests are available only for logos uploaded in vector (SVG) format.

Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo