tv variex logo review
2.7/5
Logo score Combination mark category

tv variex

creative793616 Essential logo review

Functional but generic and visually outdated; requires simplification and more distinctiveness to compete in professional media branding.

Combination Mark 3D Gradient, Geometric Sans-serif Media
4/5
Legibility
2/5
Originality
3.5/5
Balance
2.5/5
Scale
Your next steps

What to fix first

Focus on the changes that matter. Keep what makes the logo work.

1

Simplify the spherical 'X' symbol and reduce gradient reliance

High priority Medium effort

Current style limits versatility and feels derivative. A flat, abstracted mark would be more distinctive and easier to reproduce.

Improves scalability, modernity, and differentiation

2

Increase contrast in the wordmark

Medium priority Low effort

Current grey-on-white risks poor legibility in many contexts.

Improves readability and accessibility, especially in digital and print applications

Detailed review

Logo performance breakdown

Not scored

Brief & logo match

Reflects diversity with rainbow colors but lacks unique identity; relies on generic forms familiar in tech/media.

4/5

Legibility

  • Wordmark is highly readable with geometric typeface
  • Grey color reduces contrast, especially against light backgrounds
2/5

Originality

  • Rainbow gradient adds some uniqueness
  • Spherical mark with 'X' is very reminiscent of well-known tech branding
  • 3D ball and generic font feel derivative
3/5

Color harmony

  • Rainbow gradient is harmonious and eye-catching
  • Heavy reliance on gradients limits versatility and complicates printing
Silver#B8B8B8
Red#CF2A1B
Yellow#F9E384
Green#56B168
Blue#392B93
Black#000000

Estimated colors. Use the original design file for exact values.

Create a full color palette using these colors

Create new palette
3.5/5

Balance alignment

  • Central alignment of mark and wordmark
  • Size relationship between mark and wordmark feels slightly top-heavy
Uploaded logoAlignment guide overlay

Inspect spacing with the guide. Optical balance may differ from geometric centering.

2.5/5

Scalability

  • Simple geometric shapes within wordmark
  • 3D effects and gradients complicate reproduction at small sizes
  • Sphere with gradients could lose detail when reduced
4/5

Misinterpretations

  • No obvious offensive or confusing negative space
3/5

Symbol & text fit

  • Both elements are geometric, sharing visual language
  • Styling of 'X' symbol and wordmark visually connect but lack a unified concept
Try your own review

Wondering how your logo performs?

Get a clear logo score, key risks, and priority fix ideas before your client or audience sees it.

Review my logo