Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐

Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.

Try it Now!

Logo review of un:Focus

Zoom icon Logo analysis by AI

Logo type: Combination mark

Style: Modern, experimental, typographic play

Detected symbol: Thick circular mark with a break at the top right; resembles an out-of-focus camera lens or aperture

Detected text: Un:Focus

Business industry: Media

Review requested by StephenZ

**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.

Structured logo review

2 / 5

Legibility

Checkmark icon ‘Focus’ portion is more legible and uses a clean geometric sans serif.

Warning icon The blending of fonts in ‘un’ and the colon reduces immediate readability.
Warning icon Inconsistent styling between portions disrupts reading flow.
Warning icon The letter ‘F’ is partly melted into the mark below, which hinders quick recognition.
Warning icon The creative layering sacrifices clear word recognition.

3 / 5

Scalability versatility

Checkmark icon High-contrast, monochrome color scheme benefits most print and digital materials.
Checkmark icon Iconic mark is recognizable even when scaled down, provided it's used standalone.

Warning icon Thin experimental treatments in ‘un:’ may become illegible at small sizes.
Warning icon Detail loss likely for fine lines on embroidered or small-scale applications.
Warning icon Uneven typographic weights complicate scalability to mobile app icons or small packaging.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

2 / 5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Central placement of the mark above sets visual hierarchy.

Warning icon ‘un:’ and ‘Focus’ are in drastically different weights and styles, feeling disconnected.
Warning icon Colon and lower part of the ‘F’ lack alignment, creating a jarring break.
Warning icon Negative space under the logomark feels awkward and unused.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
4 / 5

Originality

Checkmark icon Inventive integration of out-of-focus visual metaphor with the abstract mark.
Checkmark icon Distinct combination of type treatments signals a conceptual, creative approach.

Warning icon The mark leans on recognizable aperture/camera iconography, which is common in media niches.
Warning icon Typographic distortion is novel but borders on being visually confusing.

2 / 5

Logomark wordmark fit

Checkmark icon Central icon could work as a standalone brand mark.

Warning icon Overly separates from the wordmark in terms of style and visual mass.
Warning icon Integration with the ‘F’ feels forced, detracting from unified branding.

2 / 5

Aesthetic look

Checkmark icon Modern and conceptual attempt; bold black and white create strong contrast.

Warning icon Busy and fragmented typographic approach appears chaotic.
Warning icon Disjointed elements overwhelm the eye and detract from polish.
Warning icon Overall look lacks cohesion, making it appear experimental rather than professional.

5 / 5

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or ambiguous symbolism detected.

5 / 5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Restrained black and white palette is classic and versatile.
Checkmark icon Strong contrast enhances visibility across mediums.

Black
#000000

White
#FFFFFF