Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of ae
Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Negative space:
Detected text:
Business industry:
Review requested by Meri
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Legibility
The letters 'a' and 'e' are prominent and easy to identify.
High contrast between black text and white background aids readability.
The heavy overlapping and distortion at the base due to the dog nose/whisker integration may confuse quick recognition of letters.
Scalability versatility
Simple color scheme ensures high contrast when scaled down.
Bold forms support clarity in various sizes.
Small details in the nose and whiskers could be lost at favicon or embroidery size.
Heavy weight may make the mark blend together if reduced too much, especially for app icons or business cards.
200x250 px
100×125 px
50×62 px
Balance alignment
Overall centralized composition keeps logo visually anchored.
Balanced horizontally with symmetrical whiskers.
The 'e' is tilted and feels heavier on the right, introducing slight visual imbalance.
Originality
Creative integration of letterforms with a stylized dog’s face.
Negative space usage is effective and distinctive.
Use of lowercase sans serif forms is somewhat standard for playful pet brands.
Aesthetic look
Strong and confident visual style.
Playful and inviting, suits the pet industry well.
Slightly crowded at the base where the letters meet the nose—could benefit from more breathing room.
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
Dog nose/whiskers motif is clear and aligns with the industry; no inappropriate associations detected.
Color harmony
Single color palette ensures classic versatility and strong contrast.
Easy to invert for various applications.
Black
#000000
White
#FFFFFF