Logo review of حياة بيبي, babys life

Legibility

Both Arabic and English text are clearly separated.
Font size is reasonably large.

English text contains a grammatical error ('babys' should be 'baby's').
Font choice is very basic and uninspired for a baby/children brand.
Contrast between text and background is good but could be increased for the baby blue.

Scalability versatility

Simple icon shapes aid in basic scaling.
Could work on banners, social media, product packaging if not downsized excessively.

Small details, especially the star and clover, may be lost at favicon or very small scale.
Fine elements and pixelation may hinder clean reproduction on embroidery, small labels, or signage.

Balance alignment

Overall centered alignment of elements.

Top symbols (clover, star, dot) are scattered with little visual cohesion to the hat.
Visual weight feels top-heavy with the cluster of shapes above the hat.
Spacing between the Arabic and English text feels cramped.

Originality

Baby hat motif is directly relevant.
Use of multi-symbols shows an attempt at a playful approach.

Symbols (hat, star, clover) are standard, generic visual language for childcare.
No creative or unique twist—elements are literal, not inventive.
Overused iconography reduces memorability.

Logomark wordmark fit

Colors of hat connect slightly with youthful theme.

Typefaces do not complement the playful, rounded look of the hat and symbols.
Font is very neutral, failing to match the personality of the illustration.

Aesthetic look

Bright, friendly color palette.

Too many unrelated small symbols; feels cluttered.
Logo appears more like a clipart collage than a refined mark.
No strong focal point, lacking visual hierarchy.

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

Fairly safe imagery for a childcare brand.

Color harmony

Colors are playful, evoke childlike vibes.

Five colors may complicate printing and reduce brand cohesiveness.
No dominant brand color established, too scattered in palette.