Logo review of Fondation Nationale des Musées (also in Arabic an..

Legibility

French and Arabic text portions are mostly legible
Clear typographic hierarchy for the French text

Tifinagh script and stylized geometric forms are difficult to decipher for those unfamiliar with the alphabet
Red-orange color on white background results in low contrast, especially in thin-line areas
Small and condensed glyphs in certain scripts further hinder legibility

Scalability versatility

Symbol is geometric and relatively simple, which helps at small sizes

Thin lines in both the symbol and multilingual wordmark may disappear on small-scale applications (e.g., business cards, web favicons, embroidery)
Complexity increases with three scripts, making full logo unsuitable for compact digital icons or badges

Balance alignment

Visual balance achieved between symbol and text block
Horizontal alignment between scripts is consistent

Block of multilingual text feels dense compared to the lighter monogram, slight imbalance in visual weight
Some inconsistencies in spacing between scripts

Originality

Unique integration of multiple scripts (Arabic, Latin, Tifinagh) and geometrically styled monogram
Abstract geometric style distinguishes it from generic cultural or institutional logos

Logomark wordmark fit

Geometric character of symbol and text complements one another
Color harmony is consistent between components

Wordmark becomes visually complex and crowded when all scripts are used together

Aesthetic look

Modern, visually intriguing, and culturally relevant
Bold use of a single color creates unity

Slightly overcomplicated due to three scripts side by side

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

No inappropriate or unintended visual associations detected

Color harmony

Consistent, unified use of warm red-orange creates visual impact
Limited color palette enhances brand recognition