Logo review of M

Legibility

The letter M is generally clearly recognizable.
Strong contrast between design and background.

3D effect introduces some minor confusion at smaller sizes.
Hand-drawn lines reduce overall crispness.

Scalability versatility

Simple outline allows for moderate scale-up.

Hand-drawn unevenness will distort at small sizes.
Thin lines and overlapping angles could become illegible as a favicon or embroidery.
Design complexity does not translate well for business cards or small icons.

Balance alignment

Visual center is somewhat maintained.

Left and right verticals are disproportionate.
Internal shapes create a visual weight imbalance.

Originality

Three-dimensional treatment of the M adds some uniqueness.
Geometric interpretation shows an attempt at stylization.

M lettermark is a common approach and lacks a distinctive concept.
No creative use of negative space or iconography outside the standard letter.

Aesthetic look

Geometric lines add a modern edge.

Hand-drawn quality undermines polish.
The busy interior lines make the logo feel cluttered.

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

No inappropriate or accidental symbols detected.

Color harmony

Monochromatic palette provides simplicity.

Background color does not contrast well with logo.
Pencil sketch does not convey professional branding colors.