Logo review of MAKAAL

Legibility

Consistent geometric shapes create a cohesive aesthetic.
Uniform stroke width aids in recognizability at larger scales.

Certain letters are difficult to distinguish due to overly abstract forms (the center 'K' and mirrored 'A's are especially confusing).
Letter spacing and sharp angles hinder quick readability, especially at a glance.
Symmetrical treatment leads to mirrored elements that can be misinterpreted as shapes rather than letters.

Scalability versatility

Bold, solid shapes maintain clarity when resized for signage or large applications.
Monochromatic palette ensures effective reproduction across different media.

Extremely angular geometry and close letter spacing may lose definition at small scales (e.g., app icons, business cards).
Abstract construction may cause confusion in small or low-resolution formats.

Balance alignment

Symmetrical design delivers a strong horizontal balance.
Even baseline alignment across all letters.

Sharp divergence at the center disrupts the natural reading flow.
Negative space under the central 'K' creates a distracting visual gap.

Originality

Distinctive geometric construction offers a unique, memorable look.
Creative abstraction of letterforms makes the logo stand out.

Sacrifices legibility for uniqueness, which can be problematic for brand recognition.
The concept of angular/geometric wordmarks has precedent in the entertainment and tech industries.

Aesthetic look

Striking, modern, and edgy visual impact.
Minimalist approach keeps the brand visually clean and focused.

Overly obtuse geometry and mirrored elements can be visually fatiguing.
Lack of softer curves or varying weights makes the logo feel rigid and flat.

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

No inappropriate or unintended symbols detected within the composition.

Color harmony

Simple black-and-white palette ensures high versatility and contrast.
Monochrome scheme is timeless and widely adaptable.