Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of myshoess

Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Detected text:
Business industry:
Review requested by Hannafer
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Legibility
Clear sans-serif and serif text contrast
Good color contrast for readability
Word 'shoess' has an apparent typo with double 's', which looks unintentional and distracts
Very light line weight could be challenging at smaller sizes
Scalability versatility
Minimalistic style helps in retaining details at various sizes
Would work on business cards, packaging, and signage
Thin lines in the monogram might get lost when the logo is scaled down for smaller applications such as favicons or embroidery
Gradient color may lose impact in single-color or black-and-white applications

200x250 px

100×125 px

50×62 px
Balance alignment
Spacing between monogram and wordmark is well considered
Monogram and text are horizontally aligned
Letter weights differ (monogram vs. wordmark), causing mild imbalance


Originality
Modern MS monogram within a soft geometric shape is somewhat unique
Contrast between script and sans-serif is a nice touch
Monogram style is fairly common in the fashion/shoe industry
No significant use of negative space or creative symbolism
Logomark wordmark fit
Both elements share a refined, minimalistic look
Visual flow from monogram to text is smooth
Monogram's roundedness does not fully reflect in the wordmark, resulting in slight stylistic separation
Aesthetic look
Clean and sophisticated feel supports a premium fashion brand
Simple color palette is elegant
Thin lines can create a fragile look
Typo in 'shoess' affects professional appearance
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
No inappropriate secondary imagery detected
Color harmony
Single gold-beige tone is harmonious and upscale
No excessive or clashing colors
Teak
#B7996E
White
#FFFFFF