Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐

Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.

Try it Now!

Logo review of SHAMEL

Zoom icon Logo analysis by AI

Logo type: Combination mark

Style: Modern, minimalistic, high-contrast

Detected symbol: Abstract flame or smoke icon

Detected text: SHAMEL

Business industry: Energy

Review requested by Nero_news

**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.

Structured logo review

4 / 5

Legibility

Checkmark icon The text 'SHAMEL' is clear, bold, and mostly easy to read.
Checkmark icon Good contrast between text and background.

Warning icon Stylized letterforms, especially the 'A' and 'M,' make quick reading slightly harder; at small sizes or from a distance, this could impact legibility.

4 / 5

Scalability versatility

Checkmark icon Simple, bold mark and wordmark ensure good legibility at larger sizes like signage or print.
Checkmark icon Will work well in monochrome and in both positive and negative spaces.

Warning icon Crispness of thin lines in the type may be lost in very small formats such as favicons or embroidery, especially the intricate negative spaces in 'A', 'M', and 'S'.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test

200x250 px

logo 100x125 pixels scalability test

100×125 px

logo 50x62 pixels scalability test

50×62 px

4 / 5

Balance alignment

Checkmark icon Good visual alignment between the symbol and text, with the icon nicely centered above the wordmark.
Checkmark icon Both elements complement each other in weight.

Warning icon Slight disproportionality between the heavy, round symbol and the sharper, more geometric wordmark.

logo 200x250 pixels scalability test alignment grid overlay
4 / 5

Originality

Checkmark icon Abstract flame/smoke symbol feels modern and is not excessively generic.
Checkmark icon Custom letterforms, particularly in the 'A' and 'M,' add differentiation.

Warning icon Three-wave flame design has some resemblance to widely used energy and gas industry marks—moderate risk of blending in.
Warning icon Wordmark style, while elegant, is not groundbreaking in approach.

4 / 5

Logomark wordmark fit

Checkmark icon Style of the abstract flame and the refined wordmark complement each other and feel cohesive.
Checkmark icon Both have a strong visual presence, unified by consistent use of black.

Warning icon Minor disconnect between the highly organic mark and the rigid, sharp-edged wordmark—could be softened for better unity.

4 / 5

Aesthetic look

Checkmark icon Minimal, powerful, and instantly impactful aesthetic.
Checkmark icon Creates a premium, professional brand perception.

Warning icon Lack of a secondary color or accent could hinder differentiation in certain applications. Underlying form is not unique enough to be unmistakable.

5 / 5

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

Checkmark icon No inappropriate or ambiguous shapes detected. The flame form is clear and free of offensive undertones.

5 / 5

Color harmony

Checkmark icon Monochrome palette creates strong contrast and timeless appeal.
Checkmark icon No clashing or excessive use of color.

Black
#000000

White
#FFFFFF