Wondering how your logo performs? 🧐
Get professional logo reviews in seconds and catch design issues in time.
Try it Now!Logo review of three abstract human figures with check marks abov..

Logo analysis by AI
Logo type:
Style:
Detected symbol:
Business industry:
Review requested by Subash
**If AI can recognize or misinterpret it, so can people.
Structured logo review
Scalability versatility
Simple geometric forms ensure some scalability without loss of clarity.
Easily recognizable at various sizes.
Fine check marks may get lost when scaled down to favicon or embroidery sizes.
Lack of text reduces versatility for branding on business cards, letterheads, or digital favicons.

200x250 px

100×125 px

50×62 px
Balance alignment
Symmetrical arrangement with well-balanced spacing between human figures.
Check marks are evenly distributed to reinforce visual balance.


Originality
Attempt at conveying teamwork and task completion with iconography.
Highly generic use of abstract people and check marks.
This visual style is overused in HR, team, and task management industries. No unique twist or element setting it apart.
Aesthetic look
Clean, minimal aesthetic.
Colors are well-coordinated and not overwhelming.
Overly generic and lacks memorable features.
Visual monotony may hinder brand recall.
Dual meaning and misinterpretations
No apparent dual meaning or inappropriate imagery.
Color harmony
Blue and green pair well, conveying trust and success.
Limited color palette with good contrast.
Science Blue
#175ECF
Eucalyptus
#33AA42
White
#FFFFFF